This paper critically reviews some previous analyses of ‘NP1i/ga NP2i/ga V’. Especially this paper aims to explain the grammatical status of NP1 and NP2. ‘NP1i/ga’ is explained as a subject, but ‘NP2’ is explained differently every paper in the previous paper. That is, the ‘NP2’ of verb “doida/anida(되다/아니다)” is a complement, but the ‘NP2’ of other verb is a subject or minor subject. But this paper argues that ‘NP2’ is a complement all. So I analyze ‘NP1i/ga NP2i/ga V’ into ‘subject + complement + predicate’.
목차
1. 머리말 2. 앞선 연구의 검토와 문제 제기 3. 'NP1이/가 NP2/가 V' 구문의 분석 3.1. 주어와 주제 3.2. 'NP1이/가 NP2/가의 문법적 기능 4. 'NP2이/가'의 동질성 회복을 위한 논의 5. 맺음말 참고문헌