Earticle

초록

영어

According to the WTO Secretariat report, during the period 1 January 1995-30 June 2007, China was the most frequent target of new anti-dumping investigations, and products exported from China were the most frequent target of new anti-dumping measures. Korea was the second
most frequently targeted country in this respect. Also, Korea and China initiated numerous anti-dumping investigations and applied anti-dumping measures vis-àà-vis each other. So, it seems very important to learn about the anti-dumping legal system of China and Korea through comparative study.
In this article, I compared the Chinese and Korean anti-dumping system with WTO rules, and analyzed it with particular reference to law of both countries. As a result of this study, I concluded that several part of the Chinese and Korean anti-dumping legal system are not consistent with WTO rules. There are also some aspects that the Chinese and Korean
government should learn from each other, such as a lesser duty rule, anti-circumvention, public interest and so on.

중국어

据世贸组织秘书处的报告，从1995年1月1日起到2007年6月30日，针对中国的反倾销调查数量最多，中国也是受到反倾销措施最多的成员。而我们的邻国韩国也受到较多的反倾销调查，成为第二大反倾销受调查成员。此外，中韩两国间又互相展开了很多反倾销调查，并最终征收反倾销税。因此，对中韩两国的反倾销法律制度进行比较研究非常有意义。在本文中，作者首先将中韩两国的反倾销制度同世贸组织规则进行了比较分析。发现两国的反倾销制度中都存在一些与世贸组织规则不一致的内容，并且也发现两国政府可就从轻征税规则、防止规避、公共利益等诸多内容进行互相学习和合作。

목차

摘要
 一. 序论
 二. 法律依据和调查机构
  (一) 两国反倾销制度的法律依据
  (二) 两国反倾销调查机构
 三. 倾销裁定
  (一) 倾销的定义
  (二) 正常价值
  (三) 出口价格
  (四) 正常价值和出口价格的比较
 四. 损害裁定
  (一) 国内产业
  (二) 损害裁定
  (三) 因果关系
 五. 调查程序
  (一) 调查立案
  (二) 展开调查
 六. 采取反倾销措施
  (一) 临时措施
  (二) 价格承诺
  (三) 征收反倾销税
  (四) 反倾销税征收期限和复审
 七. 防止反倾销规避和产品范围的调整
 八. 司法审查和报复条款
 九. 结论
 参考文献
 Abstract

저자

• 马光 [ 마광 | 浙江大学光华法学院 副教授. ]

참고문헌