Earticle

초록

영어

This paper is to provide problems and changes to be done about Korean Green Building Certification Criteria, which is similar to Japanese Green Building Certification Criteria, reorganizing and comparing Japanese system with domestic system. Firstly, Both systems are similar, but it is considered that evaluation clauses of GBCC are still inadequate. Secondly,
CASBBC can result vaguely in case the evaluation system consists of explaining way. However, GBCC evaluation clauses can make it possible to evaluate objectively by allotting marks, considering importance of each clause. Thirdly, while GBCC simply includes existence of facilities, Japanese way of system indicates more developed forms than Korean system, evaluating throughout the whole period of buildings's existence, from operation, managing, changes, removal, to recycling of buildings. Fourthly, evaluation clauses of GBCC is considered that they don't reflect Korean specifics. Overall, still domestic certification system has problems, because it is now in the process of revision and supplement. It doesn't appear to be settled in construction field, but certificated green buildings are expected to increase by making supported provisions of building law, providing incentives about apartment, increasing consumer's demands.

목차

Abstract
 1. 서론
  1.1 연구의 배경과 목적
  1.2 연구의 범위와 방법
 2. 국내 친환경 건축물 인증기준(GBCC)
  2.1 인증기준의 통합과 개요
  2.2. 인증기준의 평가항목 및 배점 분석
 3. 일본 친환경건축물 인증 기준(CASBEE)
  3.1 인증기준의 개요
  3.2. 평가방법(Environmental Labelling)
  3.3 CASBEE의 평가항목
 4. GBCC와 CASBEE 비교분석
  4.1 두 제도의 재분류 후 비교
 5. 결론
 참고문헌

저자

• 정연용 [ Jung Youn-yong | 정회원, 인제대학교 건축학과, 석사과정 ]
• 전채휘 [ John Che-Hui | 정회원, 인제대학교 건축학과 교수, 공학박사 ]

참고문헌