Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study is to present differences of priority with rank in core evaluation index for overall satisfaction on neighborhood facilities between Administrative district(Gu). To this end, this study conducted Post Occupancy Evaluation(POE) and Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA), adding 600 respdondents with 217 neighborhood facilities(total 1,001 respondents and 558 buildings). The Conclusion is as follows; First, in an analysis targeting all respondents, number of roads, vehicle-pedestrian separation(location)/frontality(site plan)/size(appearance)/interior units(unit configuration)/connectivity(environment) were derived as area of “concentrate here.” The top 5 items in rank were circulation, zoning, compartment planning, atmosphere, and landscape. Second, there are significant differences in the index included in the "concentrate here" and ranking of items at the district(gu) level. Finally, this suggests that the index that must be considered in the design of neighborhood facilities varies by district, depending on the satisfaction level, and that the quantitative/qualitative aspects of these differences can be confirmed with further researches on context components. Despite the limitations, this study would be meaningful in that it embodies the potentials in terms of POE with real-time visualization of analysis in on-line flatform.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적1
1.2 연구의 대상 및 방법
2. 배경적 고찰
2.1 근린생활시설의 정의와 현황
2.2 선행연구 고찰
2.3 설문 및 분석 방법 개요
3. 설문 문항 구성 및 평가 개요
3.1 문항설계 및 조정 과정
3.2 응답자 특성
3.3 평가 건물 특성
4. 분석결과
4.1 신뢰도-상관관계 분석 결과
4.2 전반적 만족도의 평가지표 분석
4.3 대구광역시 지역별(구 단위) IPA 비교분석
5. 결론
REFERENCES

저자

• 김훈 [ Kim, Hoon | 경북대학교 건축학과 부교수, 공학박사 ]
• 우소영 [ Woo, So-Young | 경북대학교 일반대학원 건축학과 박사과정 ]
• 추승연 [ Choo, Seong-Yeon | 경북대학교 건축학과 교수, 공학박사 ] Corresponding Author

참고문헌