Earticle

다운로드

한국적 미에 대한 오해 : 류종열, 고유섭, 윤희순의 논고 비교분석
Misunderstandings of Korean Beauty : Comparative Studies of the theses of Ryoo Jong-yeal,Ko You-seop, and Yoon Hee-soon

  • 간행물
    미술이론과 현장 바로가기
  • 권호(발행년)
    제1호 (2003.12) 바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.12-27
  • 저자
    오병욱
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A4167

원문정보

초록

영어
Art theorists support art productions by, introducing them to the public, explaining their meanings, and playing a critical part in the development of art. These tasks seem like theire opus. Because the principles of art production and the artistc languages are quite different from the ordinaries, we need 'interpreters' who can medoate us and the artists. Art works need interpretation. And the interpretation includes not only the characteristics of the given art work, but the customs, history, and the unique qualities of the race that procuved the art work. THe former director of the Korean National Museum, Choi Soon-woo wrote on the characteristics of Korean art as those that stem from the poised, arbitrary and non-elaborate state of mind. THe statement of the former Director of the National Museum has its weight far greater than just a personal opinion. In fact, we encounter the same resonance of this statement over and over reproduced in the mass media,. The problem lies on that it deals with not only a single art work, but the entire Korean art. And going further, this kinf og remarks are alreadt infused into every sector of our thought on art appreciation. In this paper, I argue for a re-reading of the characteristics of Korean beauty based on two reasons. First, the characteristic of art work is contemporary, thus we cannot define the characteristics of entire Korean art in a few words without the context of the period of its making. Seconf, Director Choi defines the characteristics that I pointes out above as 'natural' and 'nature-friendly'. Nature or beibg natural is nor an usual word that defines the characteristics of art work, which stands for the opoosite side of the nature in the binary opposition of nature/culture. To delve into these misunderstandings of Korean beauty in the popular notions of Korean Art, I suggest the re-reading if three major articles on Korean Art: Ryoo Jong-yeol's "Korean race and its art", Ko You-seup's reterarion of Ryoo's thesis called "Discourses in Korean Art History and Aesthetics," and Yoon Hee-soon's antithesis of Ryoo Jong-yeol titled "Studies on Korean Art History."

저자

  • 오병욱

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    간행물 정보

    • 간행물
      미술이론과 현장 [The Journal of Art Theory & Practice]
    • 간기
      반년간
    • pISSN
      1738-1789
    • eISSN
      2508-3538
    • 수록기간
      2003~2025
    • 등재여부
      KCI 등재
    • 십진분류
      KDC 601 DDC 701