Earticle

초록

영어

This study analyzed the school facility complexization project by utilizing IPA. Beyond the limitations of existing research, analyses were performed in terms of environmental, service, education and community contributions. In addition, it was verified whether the differences in recognition varied depending on the characteristics of the project site. According to the analysis, factors related to the building environment such as separation of school buildings and community facilities, separation of entrances and safety measures for students were important areas. For the program, indoor swimming pools and fitness centers were preferred. In particular, the satisfaction level of the facility environment, as well as the level of accessibility, hours of use, and program instructors, were also important. In the case of a school facility complex project, there are many related laws and regulations, and it is not easy to carry out the project due to sharp conflicts between various stakeholders. This suggests that maintenance and management are also important in difficult projects. Since continuous improvement of educational services and development of programs have a significant impact on stable maintenance of facilities, active response is needed. A separate analysis of the regions indicated a higher need for facilities in the declining areas. We could see that they were not only looking forward to playing a role as a sports and cultural facility, but also as a hub of the local community. The benefits also have significant implications for the living SOC project or the urban regeneration New Deal project, which the government is currently pushing for as a focal project. This study is meaningful in that it analyzed the school facility complex project, which has been dealt with in administrative and legal aspects, from a user's perspective and a local perspective.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
1.1. 연구의 배경과 목적
1.2 연구의 대상과 방법
2. 선행연구 검토
2.1 학교복합시설에 관한 연구
2.2 IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis)
2.3 쇠퇴지역과 비쇠퇴지역의 공공서비스 인식
3. 분석대상과 설문 설계
3.1 분석대상에 관한 정보
3.2 설문 및 연구설계
4. 분석 결과 및 함의
4.1 IPA 결과
4.2 집단 간 차이 검증과 회귀분석 결과
4.3 소결
5. 결론
REFERENCES

저자

• 김민재 [ Kim, Min-Jae | 인제대학교 건축학과 조교수, 도시계획학박사 ]
• 고인석 [ Ko, In-Seok | 인제대학교 건축학과 교수, 공학박사 ] Corresponding Author

참고문헌