Earticle

초록

영어

This study contends the issues that substantially hinder the comparative study for Korean genetic classification. To support the possibility of comparative study between Korean and Mongolian, this research provides plausible cognates and cognate morphemes of both languages. While recent comprehensive study of Altaic languages incorporates Korean and Mongolian, there has not been any meticulous study between the Korean and Mongolian wordstocks. Plausible cognates are introduced according to the criteria of the following six issues of questions about the Korean-Mongolian comparative study: (i) Do we have to apply the Indo-European historical linguistics methodology to Korean and Mongolian? (ii) Are the cognates found in every class of words? (iii) Are numerals necessarily basic words? (iv) Are case markers, endings, and conjunctions important parts of the morphemes in agglutinative languages? (v) Are some Chinese characters natively Korean?, and (vi) Can typological similarities be counted in?

목차

Abstract
1. 한국어와 몽골어 비교연구의 목적과 필요성
2. 한국어와 몽골어의 비교연구에서 당면한 쟁점들
2.1. 인도유럽어족의 계통론 연구의 잣대에 맞추어야 하는가?
2.2. 주요 품사부류에 골고루 공통어휘가 있는가?
2.3. 수사가 변하기 어려운 기본 어휘인가?
2.4. 접사, 격조사, 어미 등도 공통형태소로 포함시켜야 하는가?
2.5. 한국어와 몽골어에 같이 나타나는 단어가 한자어처럼 보이는 경우에 어떻게 할 것인가?
2.6. 세부적인 유형론적 요소의 동질성이 한국어계통론에 도움을 주는가?
3. 맺는말
참고문헌

저자

• 박재익 [ Jae-Ick Park | 고신대학교/교수 ]

참고문헌