Earticle

초록

영어

This study reflects the difference in community sentiment between the circulation system of the staircase-type apartment and the corridor-type apartment. For the study, two apartment complexes with similar conditions were selected in Yangpo-dong, Gumi-city. The research was carried out through theoretical research, field and existing data survey, questionnaire survey, and statistical analysis. The questionnaire consists of four main questions and the preliminary questions. As a result of the analysis on the survey, significant differences between two apartments were found in the number of neighbors (Question-1), the type of activities with the neighbors (Question-3), and the facilities for raising community sentiment (Question-4), and the regional scope of acquaintance(Question-5). On the other hand, it was found that there is no significant difference in the degree of intimacy with neighbors (Question-2). The analysis of the items with significant differences is as follows. 1) It was found that residents at the corridor-type apartment(apartment-A) have more neighbors and their relationship more extends over the outside of the complex than those in the staircase-type apartments(apartment-B). However that relationship did not develop into intimate friendships in the corridor-type apartment. 2) In both apartments, moderate social activities such as small talk and greetings occurred most. Between the two apartments, the corridor-type apartment had relatively more community activities. However, the number of community activities involving large numbers of people was significantly lower in both apartments. 3) Regarding a community activity space, both apartments had the highest demand for 'outside walkways in the complex' where light friendship activities are possible. It is noteworthy that the demand for public space on the floor was the second highest in the corridor-type apartment.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
1.1 연구배경 및 목적
1.2 연구범위 및 방법
2. 이론연구
2.1 아파트의 역사
2.2 편복도형 아파트와 계단실형 아파트의 역사와 특징
2.3 아파트의 면적구성
2.4 커뮤니티 개념과 국내의 대응
3. 조사 및 분석
3.1 연구대상지 선정 배경
3.2 양포동 내 아파트 조사
3.3 선정된 연구대상 아파트의 도시적 상황과 배치
3.4 ‘A’와 ‘B’ 아파트의 공급면적 구성
3.5 설문조사
4. 결론
REFERENCES

저자

• 안동준 [ Ahn, Dong-Joon | 금오공과대학교 건축학과 부교수, AIA ]
• 박성용 [ Park, Sung-Yong | 금오공과대학교 건축학과 부교수, AIA ] Corresponding Author

참고문헌