Earticle

Comparison Between CAUSE FOR EFFECT and EFFECT FOR CAUSE Metonymy in a Metonymy and Metaphor Continuum

  • 간행물
    언어과학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 권호(발행년)
    제26권 4호 (2019.11) 바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.221-240
  • 저자
    Youngju Choi
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A365623

원문정보

초록

영어
Many researchers have discussed that metonymy and metaphor are not clear cut categories and that many metaphors are based on metonymies. However, the question regarding which type of metonymy is prone to metaphorical extension has not been addressed so far. In order to answer the question, this paper examines four Korean body-part idioms which were intentionally used in advertisements, since the visual and verbal signs of the advertisement effectively show different stages of the continuum of metonymy and metaphor. This paper compares CAUSE FOR EFFECT and EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymies which are observed in the advertisements and concludes that the latter develops to metaphor more easily than the former. In the case of EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy, one’s emotion (cause) is referred to by one’s bodily reaction (effect), which is eventually followed by the deconflation of the domain of BODY and the domain of MIND. Since the deconflation of two domains leads to metaphor, the EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy is prone to metaphorical extension.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Previous Research on Metonymy-Based Metaphor
2.1. Radden(2003)
2.2. Riemer(2003)
3. Korean Body-Part Idioms in Advertisements
3.1. CAUSE FOR EFFECT Type Metonymy
3.2. EFFECT FOR CAUSE Type Metonymy
4. Conclusion
References

저자

  • Youngju Choi [ Professor at Chosun University ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    간행물 정보

    • 간행물
      언어과학 [Journal of Language Sciences]
    • 간기
      계간
    • pISSN
      1225-2522
    • 수록기간
      1994~2025
    • 등재여부
      KCI 등재
    • 십진분류
      KDC 705 DDC 405