Earticle

Abstract

중국어

我国 “不得作为定案根据” 的非法证据排除规则是一种结果控制, 而不是过程控制, 因此, 非法证 据排除, 被解释为将非法证据当庭 “从程序上予以排除” 是一种逻辑倒错。 一方面, 将非法证据排除 于程序之外只不过是让同类证据脱下了 “非法” 外套或者换了一个 “合法” 马甲而已。 另一方面, 侧 重于将非法证据不可采的特征在判决书之中进行说理, 并进一步通过将非法证据的证据能力问题 转化为证明力规则的减等适用才可能真正让被告人得实惠。

영어

The exclusion rules of the illegal-obtained evidences in a way of stipulating “non-available evidences for verdict” in China are a kind of result control instead of process control. Therefore, illegal evidence exclusion, interpreted as that illegal evidence “shall be excluded from the program” in court is a paralogism. On the one hand, the illegal evidence exclusion from the proceedings is only for similar evidence to take off the “illegal” coat or to put on a “legal” vest; on the other hand, it will be truly beneficial to the defendant, to focus on reasoning out the inadmissibility characteristics of the illegal evidence in the judgment, and further to convert the issue of admissibility of the illegal evidence to reductive application of probative force.

Contents

摘要
 Ⅰ. 引言：法治、 法解释与个案解释
 Ⅱ. 非法证据的权利与权力解释逻辑
 Ⅲ. 非法证据规范的证据能力与证明力解释内容
 Ⅳ. 非法证据排除的心证阻隔效果
 Ⅴ. 非法证据材料的随案移送
 Ⅵ. 结语: “非法” 与 “证据” 的分别治理
 参考文献
 

Authors

• 陆而启 [ 륙이계 | 厦门大学法学院 副敎授。 ]

Reference