Earticle

초록

영어

A case of match fixing took place in the professional sports of South Korea in the early 2010s, and it became a huge issue. Since the case, various methods have prevented such a case from happening again, but the risk of match fixing still lingers on. A professional basketball player, for instance, reported that some broker contacted him for match fixing in December, 2014. Match fixing can happen any time with brokers still in action. This study thus set out to make it clear that acts of match fixing were crimes with no doubt, reinforce punishments for match fixing, and make it sure that no more cases of match fixing would happen. The major content of the study was as follows: First, the investigator reviewed the rulings of match fixing cases in soccer, volleyball, basketball, and baseball and examined their major content and sentenced penalties. Secondly, the study also reviewed the punishment provisions for match fixing cases, investigating whether they would violate not only the National Sports Promotion Act but also criminal code. Finally, the study confirmed that the sentenced penalties of the old cases were lower than the determination criteria of punishment by the Supreme Court applicable to cases of match fixing and stressed a need to strengthen the punishment.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 연구의 필요성
  2. 연구의 목적 및 연구방법
 Ⅱ. 프로스포츠 승부조작 사건 분석
  1. 승부조작 주요 사건 경위 및 사실관계
  2. 프로스포츠 승부조작사건의 형량 분석
 Ⅲ. 프로스포츠 승부조작에 대한 처벌규정 검토
  1. 국민체육진흥법 위반죄
  2. 형법상 사기죄의 성립 여부
  3. 형법상 업무방해죄의 성립 여부
  4. 형법상 배임수재죄의 성립 여부
  5. 성립된 죄의 상호간의 관계 및 법정형의정도
 Ⅳ. 대법원 양형기준에 따른 프로스포츠 승부조작사건의 적정형량
  1. 양형기준의 도입 및 본 사건의 적용
  2. 사기죄 양형기준
  3. 양형기준에 따른 승부조작사건의 적정형량
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자

• 이현정 [ Lee, Hyun Jung | 동서대학교 ]

참고문헌