Earticle

다운로드

会社の支配権の争奪と主要目的ルール
The Contest for Corporate Control and the Rule of Primary Purpose

  • 간행물
    동북아법연구 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 권호(발행년)
    제4권 제2호 (2010.12) 바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.79-95
  • 저자
    李秀宓
  • 언어
    일본어(JPN)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A239536

원문정보

초록

영어
There is no provision in the Japanese Corporate Code on whether it is permissible for a target's board to take defensive measures against hostile takeovers. This kind of legal problem involves the rule of primary purpose, which has been created by the courts. The Tokyo High Court in the Livedoor litigation adhered to the rule of primary purpose and enunciated it as follows: Where a contest for corporate control emerges, if the primary purpose of the target corporation in issuing shares (or warrants) to a white knight is to preserve or protect management's control rights, the issuance should be enjoined as “grossly unfair,” since it violates the theory of division of authorities. The Court clarified that management should not intervene in the contest for corporate control and that the shareholders should decide the winner. The Court also declared an exception to the rule: If the hostile bidder has the abusive motive of exploiting the target corporation, the target's issuance of shares (or warrants), whose primary purpose is to preserve the management's right of control, may be permitted to the extent the defensive measures are recognized as necessary and appropriate. Even though this is only obiter dictum, the court's opinion has had an influence on business. The rule of primary purpose has the function of regulating the target's management. The courts have based their decisions on the rule and stated that the target's management should not intervene in the contest for corporate control; the decision of whether the target should take defensive measures must be made by the shareholders. However, shareholders are not good decision-makers regarding hostile takeovers, which involve skilled business judgment. Moreover, for the target corporation, it is difficult to apply the exception to the rule. It is time to consider how to enact takeover law that can deal with the problems arising from the rule of primary purpose.

목차

I.  はじめに
 II. 裁判例の分析
 III. 結びに代えて
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자

  • 李秀宓 [ 이수복 | 日本 愛知大学 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    간행물 정보

    • 간행물
      동북아법연구 [Northeast Asian law journal]
    • 간기
      연3회
    • pISSN
      1976-5037
    • 수록기간
      2007~2026
    • 등재여부
      KCI 등재
    • 십진분류
      KDC 369 DDC 341