Earticle

다운로드

리조트기업의 R&D 평가지표 우선순위 연구
Priority Order Evaluation of the Evaluation Indicator of Resort Company R&D Programs

  • 간행물
    한국스포츠학회지 KCI 등재후보 바로가기
  • 권호(발행년)
    제12권 제1호 (2014.03) 바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.363-374
  • 저자
    조충현, 김화룡
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A217810

원문정보

초록

영어
The purpose of this study is to suggest the importance of R&D of Resort Company and made a priority order through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Develop a index evaluation of proposed R&D’s estimation and draw a conclusion about perception of employee who works in a resort by analyze and examine the R&D’s major factor. For the survey object, total 17 out of 30 people were selected as a sample by purposeful sampling including team manager from D, M, H, Y, R resort. In this process, research was conducted March 1st to June 30th, 2012, and the importance priority order was analyzed by conducting analytichierarchyprocess(AHP) oftheextractedfactors.Forthedataprocessing,allthedatawentthroughencodingpr ocedureforstatisticaltreatmentandfrequencyanalysiswasconductedwithinputdatabyusingWindowsSPSS/PC (ver. 18.0).FortheAHPtodecidepriorityorderwasimplementedbyusingEC-2000.Theresultsofthisstudyareasfollowed. First, relative importance of hierarchical classification indicated management 46.6%, technology 37.3%, and strategy 16.1% has highest weight in resort R&D major factor and management, technology, strategy has highly ranked. Second, weight of major factor’s management class indicated facilities 39.2%, environment 24.8%, manpower human resources 23.0%, and organization 13.0% in order. Facilities have highest weigh in administration’s major factor and the order from relative importance was facilities, environment, manpower human resources, and organization in order. Third, weight of major factor’s technology class indicated IT technology 77.0%, information technology 23.0% in order. IT technology has highest weigh in technology class and the order from relative importance was IT new technology, information technology in order. Fourth, weight of major factor’s strategy layer class indicated marketing 52.3%, investment 24.5%, policy 13.8%, process 9.8 in order. Marketing has highest weigh in strategy layer class and the order from relative importance was marketing, investment, policy and process in order.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
 Ⅱ. 연구방법
  1. 연구대상
  2. 조사 절차
  3. 측정항목
  4. 일관성 검증 및 자료처리
 Ⅲ. 연구 결과 및 논의
  1. R&D 평가지표 우선순위의 전문가 조사
  2. R&D 평기지표 우선순위를 위한 AHP 분석
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
  1. 결론
  2. 제언
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자

  • 조충현 [ Cho, Chung-Hyun | 원광대학교 ]
  • 김화룡 [ Kim, Hwa-Ryong | 한국체육대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    간행물 정보

    • 간행물
      한국스포츠학회지 [The Korea Journal of Sport]
    • 간기
      계간
    • pISSN
      1738-3250
    • 수록기간
      2003~2026
    • 등재여부
      KCI 등재
    • 십진분류
      KDC 692 DDC 796