Earticle

Downloads

인사권 행사의 정당성
Validity of Personnel Management Right

  • Journal
    동북아법연구 KCI 등재 Shortcut
  • Issue (Year)
    제7권 제2호 (2013.09) Shortcut
  • Page
    pp.131-151
  • Authors
    김성진
  • Language
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A204970

원문정보

Abstract

영어
This article contains my opinion about when employer’s exercise of personnel management right should be recognized as valid. Therefore, I summarized the concept and content of the personnel management right and the guarantee of rights to work,and then based on these; I explained my opinion on how to solve the conflicts created between these two rights. First, the personnel management right is the right given to the employer to organize and use the employees under contract for effective management of the business. The legal evidence is the contract. The disadvantageous execution of the employee due to the exercise of personnel management right is also not good for the employees regardless whether it includes punishment or not. Second, based on paragraph 1 and 3 of Article 32 of the Constitution, the right to work is guaranteed through relevant laws such as Labor Standards Law. This means,the employees have rights to request their employer the proper treatment to maintain the dignity of the men during the contract. This also means, the employees have rights to maintain personal properties and position of labor relations position. Third, the right of personal management and the right to work both affect each other through the labor contract and cause conflict. As a method to solve this issue, the ‘legitimate reason’ on paragraph 1 of Article 23 of Labor Standards Law can be applied. When interpreting this regulation, one must consider that the right to work has relatively superior benefit and the personnel management right of employer is only allowed when it has a good reason for exceptionally legitimate. This means, as the exercise of personnel management is limited due to the right to work, most personnel management rights is constrained by right to work unless there is an exceptional case that brought significant effect on the existence of the company.

Contents

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
 Ⅱ. 인사권의 개념과 근거
 Ⅲ. 근로권보장의 의의
 Ⅳ. 인사권행사의 정당성
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

Authors

  • 김성진 [ Kim, Sung-Jin | 전북대학교 법학전문대학원 교수 ]

Reference

    간행물 정보

    • Journal
      동북아법연구 [Northeast Asian law journal]
    • Frequency
      연3회
    • pISSN
      1976-5037
    • Date range
      2007~2026
    • Registration
      KCI 등재
    • Category
      KDC 369 DDC 341