Earticle

다운로드

2011년 하계유니버시아드대회 남자 평행봉 결승경기의 연기내용 경향분석
The Analysis of Exercise Content on the Parallel Bars in the Universiade 2011

  • 간행물
    한국스포츠학회지 KCI 등재후보 바로가기
  • 권호(발행년)
    제11권 제1호 (2013.03) 바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.307-315
  • 저자
    남승구, 김동민
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A196684

원문정보

초록

영어
The purpose of this study was to analyze the difficult degree and accomplishment of element group types for parallel bars in man's. Eight male gymnasts, who were qualified IIIrd game(Final of each event) of The 26th Summer Universiade in Shenzhen, China, were selected as the subject of this study. The author who participated the game as judge, through VTR that did shoot the final game by item, directly recorded the gymnasts' performance and then, analyzed them Code of point 2009 for men prescribed by F.I.G. Firstly, the start value what the gymnasts selected for their performance were 7.00(1person), 6.50(2person), 6.40(1person), 6.30(2person), 6.00(1person), 5.80(1person). The difficult degree what the gymnasts most used the game was D difficult degree(6.0±1.41) followed by C difficult degree(1.75±1.03)and E difficult degree(1.62±1.50). Secondly, it was revealed that the most frequently used skills depends on element groups, were "healy to support(8 times)", "backward uprise and salto forward piked to support(4times)", "tippelt(7times)", " basket to handstand(8times)" and "double salto backward piked (8times)" for Ist, IInd, IIIrd, IVth, and Vth element groups, respectively. Finally, it was found that IIIrd group (2.4 point: 90.0%), IVth group (2.0 point: 88.8%), Ist group (2.8 point: 88.3%), IInd group (1.8 point: 83.6%), followed by Vth group showed the most accomplishment(1.8 point: 77.5%). While the gymnasts perform their performance, the difficult degree affect the start value and the accomplishment affects final score. Therefore, to obtain the higher performance score, gymnasts should increase their skill accuracy and reduce their mistakes and range of penalties.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 연구의 필요성
 Ⅱ. 연구방법
  1. 연구 대상
  2. 연구내용 및 도구
  3. 자료 분석 방법
 Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
  1. 각 선수별 시작점수와 난도요소 비교 분석
  2. 요소그룹별 기술유형 및 난도 가치점 분석
  3. 각 요소그룹별 완성도 분석
 Ⅳ. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자

  • 남승구 [ Nam, Seung-Ku | 한국체육대학교 ]
  • 김동민 [ Kim, Dong-Min | 한국체육대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    간행물 정보

    • 간행물
      한국스포츠학회지 [The Korea Journal of Sport]
    • 간기
      계간
    • pISSN
      1738-3250
    • 수록기간
      2003~2026
    • 등재여부
      KCI 등재
    • 십진분류
      KDC 692 DDC 796