Earticle

Downloads

채권자대위소송에 있어서 당사자적격의 흠결과 중복소송의 경합에 관한 소고
Study on the competition of duplicate lawsuit and deficiency of standing in subrogation action by an obligee

  • Journal
    동북아법연구 KCI 등재 Shortcut
  • Issue (Year)
    제6권 제3호 (2013.01) Shortcut
  • Page
    pp.147-168
  • Authors
    최상경
  • Language
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A191597

원문정보

Abstract

영어
Subrogation action by an obligee is a lawsuit where a person, holding the subrogation right of the obligee under civil law, files a lawsuit by right of subrogation. According to civil law, subrogation action by an obligee recognizes the obligee to hold the right of performing the litigation of existence and nonexistence on behalf of the original right holder, the obligor; thus it is acknowledged that the obligee is holds a statutory standing in such case. As far as the legal nature of subrogation action by an obligee is understood as the litigant with statutory standing, it is appropriate to consider that the existence of claim to preservation is related to the existence of standing and is applicable to the requirements for litigation. Therefore, in case an obligee without claim to preservation files a subrogation action, the action is considered unlawful as it does not hold a standing. When a subrogation action (competition of subrogation action) filed independently by multiple obligees or pendency of a lawsuit filed by an obligee or an obligor, in case an obligor or an obligee files a lawsuit later, the later and previous lawsuits become duplicate lawsuits because the litigants or subject matters of each action are the same. During the pendency of a subrogation action by an obligee filed without claim to preservation, a defect occurs between standing (previous lawsuit) and duplicate (later lawsuit) lawsuits and the two compete as another obligee with claim to preservation each files a lawsuit later against the same obligor.As a solution to resolve the competition of defect between standing and duplicate lawsuits due to a lack of claim to preservation, in principle, the principle of investigation order for litigation requirements must be applied. However, in cases where the practical resolving of the conflict or the protection of practical obligee is violated, the application of such principle must be limited; in such case, this study suggests a solution that can resolve the conflict and protect the obligee.

Contents

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 피보전채권과 당사자적격
 Ⅲ. 채권자대위소송과 중복소송
 Ⅳ. 당사자적격의 흠결과 중복소송의 경합 및 그 해결 방안
 V. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 Abstract

Authors

  • 최상경 [ Choi Sangkyoung | 전북대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수, 변호사. ]

Reference

    간행물 정보

    • Journal
      동북아법연구 [Northeast Asian law journal]
    • Frequency
      연3회
    • pISSN
      1976-5037
    • Date range
      2007~2026
    • Registration
      KCI 등재
    • Category
      KDC 369 DDC 341