Earticle

Abstract

영어

With a good reason, illegal collaboration is an important object in the law of monopoly regulation. China also arranged and enacted the related contents under the term of monopoly agreement when antimonopoly law was established in 2008. Article 13 and Article 13 of antimonopoly law in China arranged and enacted the behaviors applicable to vertical monopoly consultation and horizontal agreement in large. In addition article 15 states exceptional cases of monopoly agreement. Article 46 of antimonopoly law in China regulates that when a business person consults about monopoly in violation of antimonopoly law, antimonopoly enforcement organizations can stop illegal behaviors and impose administrative fine, and also regulates remissions for voluntary declarator. In addition, enforcement organizations of antimonopoly law in State Council of the People's Republic of China, NDRC and SAIC, make up for detailed rules on antimonopoly law, that is enacts the regulations of anti-price monopoly and the regulation of behavior agreements prohibited by SAIC. There are many, insufficient and complementary, except punishment of monopoly agreement and remissions for voluntary declarator in antimonopoly law in China, though many years didn't pass from enforcement. But, this thesis looks into monopoly agreement in China, and examines some complementary points on remissions for voluntary declarator through comparison between that of Korea and that of China, after drawing out its characteristics and problems.

Contents

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 독점협의 의의 및 종류
 Ⅲ. 독점협의에 대한 처벌
 Ⅳ. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

Authors

• 양병찬 [ Yang, Byoung Chan | 서남대학교 경찰행정법학과 전임강사, 법학박사 ]

Reference