Wibawa, A. D, Verdonschot, N, Halbertsma, J. P. K, Burgerhof, J. G. M, Diercks, R. L, Verkerke, G. J
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A294352
※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
원문정보
초록
영어
Musculoskeletal modeling nowadays is becoming the most common tool for studying and analyzing human motion. Besides its potential in predicting muscle activity and muscle force during active motion, musculoskeletal modeling can also calculate many important kinetic data that are difficult to measure in vivo, such as joint force or ligament force. This paper will validate muscle activity predicted by the model during a static motion like knee flexion motion (squat motion). In this experiment, knee flexion motion was performed by 5 healthy subjects and modeled by using Gait Lower Extremity model from AnyBody Modeling System (AMS). Eight lower limb muscle activity prediction from the model will be validated by 8 EMG electrodes that measured the same muscles during squat motion. Muscle activity pattern and the position of onset would be used as a key factor in this validation study. Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to compare the pattern of both graphs. Knee joint force prediction from the model will also be compared with the literature studies. The result showed that 3 muscles showed high correlation coefficient, while the other 4 muscles showed slightly medium and one showed low correlation. Time delay of muscle activation between the model and EMG was recorded from Vastus Medialis muscle (18.38 ms) and Vastus Lateralis (22.8 ms), with muscle activation from the model was late compared to EMG. In conclusion, this statistical study has shown some detail differences between EMG and muscle activity prediction from the model. Knee flexion motion can be used as a trap motion when validating muscle activity of a musculoskeletal model, because the model will activate muscle activity based on motion data of markers, while in knee-flexed position, there was no marker’s movement, but the EMG was highly active due to the posture of the subjects in maintaining the knee-flexed position. However, the knee compressive force prediction from the model has showed positive confirmation from the literatures.
목차
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Method 2.1 Subjects 2.2 Protocol and Modeling the Motion 2.3. Data Analysis 2.4. EMG Comparison 3. Result 4. Discussion and Conclusion References
Wibawa, A. D [ Department of Multimedia and Network Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia ]
Verdonschot, N [ Orthopaedics Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands / Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands ]
Halbertsma, J. P. K [ Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands ]
Burgerhof, J. G. M [ Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands ]
Diercks, R. L [ Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands ]
Verkerke, G. J [ Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands / Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands ]
보안공학연구지원센터(IJBSBT) [Science & Engineering Research Support Center, Republic of Korea(IJBSBT)]
설립연도
2006
분야
공학>컴퓨터학
소개
1. 보안공학에 대한 각종 조사 및 연구
2. 보안공학에 대한 응용기술 연구 및 발표
3. 보안공학에 관한 각종 학술 발표회 및 전시회 개최
4. 보안공학 기술의 상호 협조 및 정보교환
5. 보안공학에 관한 표준화 사업 및 규격의 제정
6. 보안공학에 관한 산학연 협동의 증진
7. 국제적 학술 교류 및 기술 협력
8. 보안공학에 관한 논문지 발간
9. 기타 본 회 목적 달성에 필요한 사업
간행물
간행물명
International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology
간기
격월간
pISSN
2233-7849
수록기간
2009~2016
등재여부
SCOPUS
십진분류
KDC 505DDC 605
이 권호 내 다른 논문 / International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology Vol.8 No.6